IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpdev/v6y2008i3-4p393-419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco-labelling and product development: potentials and experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Frieder Rubik
  • Dirk Scheer
  • Fabio Iraldo

Abstract

The last years promoted new policy instruments based on cooperation and aiming at a higher degree of voluntariness and self-regulation. Eco-labelling is a typical instrument applied in this context. Eco-labels award and promote environmentally superior goods and services and offer information on their quality and performance with respect to consumer health, resource consumption, and environmental impacts. We present an overview on the history and 'landscape' of eco-labels and explain objectives and mechanisms. Later, we examine potentials and experiences within business. In the following, an empirical view on the state, successes and failures of eco-labelling – primarily based on a meso- and macro-economic view – is presented. We close with consequences and challenges for strengthening eco-labelling.

Suggested Citation

  • Frieder Rubik & Dirk Scheer & Fabio Iraldo, 2008. "Eco-labelling and product development: potentials and experiences," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3/4), pages 393-419.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:6:y:2008:i:3/4:p:393-419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=20401
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wehnert, Peter & Baccarella, Christian V. & Beckmann, Markus, 2019. "In crowdfunding we trust? Investigating crowdfunding success as a signal for enhancing trust in sustainable product features," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 128-137.
    2. Laura Therese Heinl & Anna Baatz & Markus Beckmann & Peter Wehnert, 2021. "Investigating Sustainable NGO–firm Partnerships: An Experimental Study of Consumer Perception of Co-Branded Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Nikolay Minkov & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2018. "Characterization of the Cradle to Cradle Certified™ Products Program in the Context of Eco-labels and Environmental Declarations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Fabio Iraldo & Michele Barberio, 2017. "Drivers, Barriers and Benefits of the EU Ecolabel in European Companies’ Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:6:y:2008:i:3/4:p:393-419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=36 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.