IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpdev/v3y2006i3-4p278-291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design for Six Sigma in product development at Ford Motor Company in a case study on robust exhaust manifold design

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Gerhorst
  • Ulrike Gromping
  • David Lloyd-Thomas
  • Faysal Khalaf

Abstract

Many Design for Six Sigma approaches used throughout the industry have one critical aspect, which is the linkage between the phases of the product development process and ultimately how effectively design decisions can be influenced. Presenting a case study on robust design of exhaust manifolds, we show how transfer function knowledge is used to ensure less iterations than previously needed, satisfy program timing needs and systematically generate a robust solution. This case study uses a parametric model for Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and experimental design techniques especially suitable for computer model responses. Meta-modelling is, in this case, the measure against resource-intensive Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) applications. Analysing the range of all packageable alternatives, rather than just nominal parameters, allows for the assessment of robustness under the presence of noise factors, such as dimensional part-to-part variation. The outcome is a new approach in the manifold design.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Gerhorst & Ulrike Gromping & David Lloyd-Thomas & Faysal Khalaf, 2006. "Design for Six Sigma in product development at Ford Motor Company in a case study on robust exhaust manifold design," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3/4), pages 278-291.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:3:y:2006:i:3/4:p:278-291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=9894
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:3:y:2006:i:3/4:p:278-291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=36 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.