IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpdev/v25y2021i1p11-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A meta-analysis of stability and flexibility effects on performance in product development

Author

Listed:
  • Denniz Dönmez
  • Matthew J. Kerry
  • Gudela Grote

Abstract

Product development teams need stability to operate efficiently and flexibility to adjust dynamically. Stability and flexibility have typically been studied in separate literatures of organisational adaptation and design, respectively. The separation of stability-flexibility has led to the two constructs as incompatibles. The current study uses the product development domain to synthesise the disparate literatures. A systematic review resulted in K = 55 analysed studies (N = 11,666). Our findings are three-fold. First, stability and flexibility exhibit a significant positive relationship. Meta-regressions support joint-positive effects with shared-variance (18%) in performance. Second, although structural forms typify stability and flexibility, stronger performance effects are observed for behavioural forms. Third, stability's stronger effect for project (vs. product) performance is evident only by complementary conceptions. That is, structural stability's project effect is strengthened by behavioural flexibility, and vice-a-versa. Conceptual conflation of stability and flexibility obscures the differential performance effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Denniz Dönmez & Matthew J. Kerry & Gudela Grote, 2021. "A meta-analysis of stability and flexibility effects on performance in product development," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(1), pages 11-39.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:25:y:2021:i:1:p:11-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=115703
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:25:y:2021:i:1:p:11-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=36 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.