IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v51y2024i4p469-490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study of maximisation assignment model by existing method and newly proposed methods

Author

Listed:
  • Agnivesh Tiwari
  • Kabir Chaudhary
  • Rahul Boadh
  • Yogendra Kumar Rajoria

Abstract

One of the simplest uses of linear programming is known as the assignment problem, which is a special case of the transportation problem. The assignment problem manages the inquiry about to dole out n-items to m-different items in the most ideal way for production planning, telecommunication, VLSI design, economics, etc. Many researchers developed newly proposed methods for solving assignment problems and others modified the Hungarian method. Therefore, in the present study, an effort has been made to solve the real-life balance and unbalance type profit maximisation assignment problem used by ten newly proposed methods such as MAP, MSEI, ATOC, NAZs and six others methods, and compared results with Hungarian method. This study found that Method 8 takes the least time for computation of both type problems as compared with other methods. This paper advocates that new researchers and scientists may use the newly proposed Method 8 in place of the existing method.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnivesh Tiwari & Kabir Chaudhary & Rahul Boadh & Yogendra Kumar Rajoria, 2024. "Comparative study of maximisation assignment model by existing method and newly proposed methods," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 51(4), pages 469-490.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:51:y:2024:i:4:p:469-490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=143341
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:51:y:2024:i:4:p:469-490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.