IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v32y2018i2p223-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing new methods for determining weights of components in network data envelopment analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hojatollah Rajabi Moshtaghi
  • Gholam Reza Faramarzi
  • Reza Farzipoor Saen

Abstract

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a powerful tool for measuring relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs). In many cases such DMUs have network structures with internal structures. Traditional DEA models, however, consider DMUs as black boxes without considering their internal structures. Furthermore, overall efficiency in multi component networks is based on efficiencies of their components. Cook et al. (2010) used the additive weighted average of components' efficiencies to calculate overall efficiency. They used the ratio of total weighted input of component to total weighted input of whole components as a weight of component. As an alternative approach, Faramarzi et al. (2014) proposed that the weights are the ratio of total weighted output at the ith component to total weighted output of whole components. In this paper, we propose three novel methods to obtain the weights of components. Then, to compare these three new methods and the methods proposed by Cook et al. (2010) and Faramarzi et al. (2014), we present a case study. Finally, using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, we analyse the correlation among different approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Hojatollah Rajabi Moshtaghi & Gholam Reza Faramarzi & Reza Farzipoor Saen, 2018. "Developing new methods for determining weights of components in network data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 32(2), pages 223-250.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:32:y:2018:i:2:p:223-250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92015
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:32:y:2018:i:2:p:223-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.