IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v21y2014i4p451-465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new higher moment portfolio optimisation model with conditional value at risk

Author

Listed:
  • Saiful Hafizah Jaaman
  • Weng Hoe Lam
  • Zaidi Isa

Abstract

Variance is a common risk measure used for constructing portfolios. However, variance strictly depends on the assumptions that the returns of assets are not normally distributed or investor's function is quadratic. Moreover, variance not only penalises the downside deviations below the mean return but also the upside deviation, variance, thus, does not match investor's desire to maximise the upside deviation and minimise the downside deviation. The objective of this paper is to propose a new four moment mean-conditional-value-at-risk-skewness-kurtosis model and empirically test the model. In this proposed model, variance is replaced with conditional value at risk as the risk measure. The polynomial goal programming method is used in this study as it is flexible to incorporate different degree of investor's preference on mean, skewness and kurtosis. Results of this study demonstrate that the mean-CVaR-skewness-kurtosis model gives higher mean return and skewness and provides better performance than the mean-variance-skewness-kurtosis model for all combinations of degree of preferences. This implies that CVaR is a better risk measure than variance in portfolio optimisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Saiful Hafizah Jaaman & Weng Hoe Lam & Zaidi Isa, 2014. "A new higher moment portfolio optimisation model with conditional value at risk," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(4), pages 451-465.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:21:y:2014:i:4:p:451-465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=65613
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:21:y:2014:i:4:p:451-465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.