IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v20y2014i2p156-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating strong, weak and hybrid formulations of the single stage capacitated warehouse location problem

Author

Listed:
  • R.R.K. Sharma
  • G.C. Mouli
  • Mayank Verma
  • Priyanka Verma

Abstract

Lower bound (LB) of weak formulation of single stage capacitated warehouse location problem (SSCWLP) has low strength when compared to that of the strong formulation. Hence, the overall computational time to solve the weak formulation of SSCWLP is very high. Strong formulation take lesser branch-and-bound (B%B) nodes to solve SSCWLP but at the cost of higher computational time for linear programming (LP) relaxation at each node. Thus a trade-off is required, leading to the hybrid formulation, containing better characteristics of strong and weak formulations. Most promising constraints are utilised to reduce computational effort. Extensive computational experiments show that significantly superior LB are obtained by hybrid formulation compared to those obtained from weak formulation while significantly less computational time is taken for solving the LP relaxation compared to that taken by strong formulation. The gain in reduction of computational time using reformulation outweighs the cost of expanding the earlier formulation.

Suggested Citation

  • R.R.K. Sharma & G.C. Mouli & Mayank Verma & Priyanka Verma, 2014. "Evaluating strong, weak and hybrid formulations of the single stage capacitated warehouse location problem," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(2), pages 156-179.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:20:y:2014:i:2:p:156-179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=61767
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:20:y:2014:i:2:p:156-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.