IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v19y2014i2p198-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing the discrimination power of data envelopment analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Alireza Amirteimoori
  • Sohrab Kordrostami
  • Atefeh Masoumzadeh
  • Mahnaz Maghbouli

Abstract

In data envelopment analysis (DEA), to discriminate between efficient units, several ranking methods have been proposed by different authors from various points of views. However, despite of the fact that each technique has some advantages and disadvantages, all of them will face the relatively high computational complexity level. Moreover, different ranking procedures yield to different results. Although there are many ranking approaches in DEA literature, there is a need to provide a complete ranking on efficient units with a lower complexity. The current paper proposes a complete ranking method for fully ranking of all DMUs. Furthermore, this approach makes use of a common set of weights for all DMUs. In the proposed ranking approach, the infeasibility and instability problems of the existing methods have been removed. Moreover, the computational effort of the approach is relatively low in comparison to the existing methods. Sample and real cases will be presented for more illustration.

Suggested Citation

  • Alireza Amirteimoori & Sohrab Kordrostami & Atefeh Masoumzadeh & Mahnaz Maghbouli, 2014. "Increasing the discrimination power of data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(2), pages 198-210.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:19:y:2014:i:2:p:198-210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=58950
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:19:y:2014:i:2:p:198-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.