IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v16y2013i1p113-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiobjective planning for naval mine counter measures missions

Author

Listed:
  • Casey D. Trail
  • Mendel D. Schmiedekamp
  • Shashi Phoha
  • John P. Sustersic

Abstract

Near-optimal scheduling and allocation for DoD missions is complicated by many factors, including multiple measures of effectiveness, mixed-initiatives, heterogeneity of systems and non-uniformity of homogenous systems; these factors contribute to a complex planning problem with non-linear, combinatorial, and continuous components that is further complicated by information uncertainty. In Navy, mine counter measure missions, planning entails components of the vehicle routing problem with time windows and flexible flowshop scheduling with pre-emptive maintenance. We present a multiobjective mine counter measures problem formulation and describe the non-dominated scheduler, a scheduling programme that parametrically explores continuous dimensions of the decision space, stochastically samples from exponentially large decision spaces, and uses surrogate metrics to bound computational complexity. This provides mission commander with a non-dominated set of alternative plans. This scheduler has been integrated into existing tools and is being evaluated by the US Navy for extension and integration into next-generation mine warfare decision aids.

Suggested Citation

  • Casey D. Trail & Mendel D. Schmiedekamp & Shashi Phoha & John P. Sustersic, 2013. "Multiobjective planning for naval mine counter measures missions," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 113-135.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:16:y:2013:i:1:p:113-135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=50626
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sakai, Kazuki & Hohzaki, Ryusuke & Fukuda, Emiko & Sakuma, Yutaka, 2018. "Risk evaluation and games in mine warfare considering shipcounter effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 300-313.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:16:y:2013:i:1:p:113-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.