IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijodei/v4y2016i1-2p113-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing online community structure of patients of chronic diseases

Author

Listed:
  • Peter A. Gloor
  • Hanuma Teja Maddali
  • Peter A. Margolis

Abstract

In this paper, we use social media as a mirror to understand hidden characteristics of patients of chronic diseases, who are expressing themselves on Twitter, Facebook, and in online forums. We compare the social network structure and emotionality of people talking about Crohn's disease, cystic fibrosis, and Type 1 diabetes. We find that the Crohn's community's contributors are most negative on social media, while patients of cystic fibrosis are surprisingly positive. We also notice more centralised network structure of Twitter retweet networks and Facebook wall post networks for cystic fibrosis and Crohn's than for Type 1 diabetes. This might indicate the strong leadership role played by their national foundations, Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF).

Suggested Citation

  • Peter A. Gloor & Hanuma Teja Maddali & Peter A. Margolis, 2016. "Comparing online community structure of patients of chronic diseases," International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1/2), pages 113-136.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijodei:v:4:y:2016:i:1/2:p:113-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=80161
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijodei:v:4:y:2016:i:1/2:p:113-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=344 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.