IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijodei/v3y2013i2p185-205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building trust in virtual organisations: a case study of trust and gender in a scientific virtual organisation breeding environment

Author

Listed:
  • Dhiraj Murthy
  • Macgill Eldredge

Abstract

This paper examines an online life science virtual organisation breeding environment (VBE), an incubator of temporary or more permanent virtual organisations (VOs). In the VBE studied, scientists could connect and collaborate with one another using various social media technologies such as profiles, messaging, blogs, and forums. This article is particularly focused on the ways in which social media technologies facilitate interactions between participants in the 'WomenScientists1' group. This study employs content analysis of all textual discourse on the group and social network analysis to understand the relationship of users in this network. This paper seeks to address three core questions. First, we explore what types of interactions facilitate trust formations. We find that interactions that share personal information positively elicit trust from other users. Second, we examine which demographic attributes contribute to the growth of trust interactions. We find that a user's gender and their membership of the group are correlated with trust interactions. Third, we find that if users are unilaterally trusted (via a 'leap of faith'), they are likely to reciprocate, forming bilateral or multilateral trust relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhiraj Murthy & Macgill Eldredge, 2013. "Building trust in virtual organisations: a case study of trust and gender in a scientific virtual organisation breeding environment," International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 185-205.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijodei:v:3:y:2013:i:2:p:185-205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=57024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijodei:v:3:y:2013:i:2:p:185-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=344 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.