IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijodei/v2y2012i3p250-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying the principle of separation of concerns to business process design

Author

Listed:
  • Artur Caetano
  • António Rito Silva
  • José Tribolet

Abstract

Functional decomposition breaks down a business process into a set of progressively more detailed activities. It facilitates the modular design of a system, the reuse of its parts and also contributes to increasing its comprehensibility. But achieving these qualities requires a business process to be decomposed consistently. Separation of concerns is the principle of separating a system into distinct features with a minimum of overlapping. This paper proposes using this principle to consistently decompose a business process into its constituent activities. An activity is modelled as a collaboration between role types that are played by entities. The decomposition method successively separates the overlapping roles until an activity is specified by the collaboration of an orthogonal set of role types. This method facilitates the consistent decomposition and design of a business process and the unambiguous identification of its atomic activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Artur Caetano & António Rito Silva & José Tribolet, 2012. "Applying the principle of separation of concerns to business process design," International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 250-270.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijodei:v:2:y:2012:i:3:p:250-270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=49695
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijodei:v:2:y:2012:i:3:p:250-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=344 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.