IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmtma/v33y2019i5p342-361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advantageous and disadvantageous inequality fairness concerns: the impact on the single-vendor single-buyer production-inventory system

Author

Listed:
  • Kaifang Fu
  • Zhixiang Chen
  • Hui-Ming Wee

Abstract

Behaviour diversities and preferences have affected decision making in business. This paper studies the behavioural operations effect in a production inventory system of one vendor and one buyer. Two types of fairness concerns behaviour (advantageous and disadvantageous inequality fairness concerns) of the buyer are taken into account in the decision model. We analyse how these two fairness concerns impact the optimal decision and channel coordination. The result shows several implications. Firstly, the buyer's optimal ordering quantity and expected utility show opposing trend when the buyer has fairness concerns. Secondly, the stronger bargaining power of the vendor results in an increasing buyer's optimal ordering quantity under the advantageous inequality case, but decreasing under the disadvantageous inequality case. Thirdly, the single-vendor single-buyer production-inventory is coordinated under the advantageous inequality case. From our literature search, no study has been done on the field of behavioural operations management from the perspective of this paper. Our study can offer managerial insights for the optimisation of the production-inventory system.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaifang Fu & Zhixiang Chen & Hui-Ming Wee, 2019. "Advantageous and disadvantageous inequality fairness concerns: the impact on the single-vendor single-buyer production-inventory system," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 33(5), pages 342-361.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:33:y:2019:i:5:p:342-361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=103278
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:33:y:2019:i:5:p:342-361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.