IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmtma/v22y2011i3p247-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CoCa: a tool for analysing collaborative practices to improve design process management

Author

Listed:
  • Graham Jared
  • Christophe Merlo
  • Jeremy Legardeur
  • Guillaume Pol

Abstract

This paper focuses on the coordination of engineering design from the collaboration point of view in order to help managers in controlling design processes. We focus on the organisation and process aspects to facilitate collaboration between designers and to foster the coordination of design projects by integrating the product, process and organisation points of view (PPO model). Indeed, the results of the collaborative design activities directly depend on relationships between design actors. Our aim is to allow project managers to enhance and control different types of collaborative processes in order to prescribe emerging collaboration between different experts. We propose then a method for storing and analysing collaborative processes in situ, in order that such processes can be formalised and re-used by project managers. This method is supported by a dedicated and implemented tool, called CoCa. A case study in an SME, designing and manufacturing innovative mechanical products, has been carried out to evaluate the possible feedback to design coordination, in particular by managing collaborative processes through PLM systems workflow technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham Jared & Christophe Merlo & Jeremy Legardeur & Guillaume Pol, 2011. "CoCa: a tool for analysing collaborative practices to improve design process management," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(3), pages 247-258.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:247-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=39146
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:22:y:2011:i:3:p:247-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.