IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmtma/v1y2000i2-3p288-317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing the effectiveness of lean clustering in establishing benchmarks for automatic classification systems

Author

Listed:
  • T.C. Hsia, S.H. Hsu, W.Y. Huang, M.C. Wu

Abstract

The classification of workpieces according to their shape can enhance the efficiency of workpiece design and production. The lean clustering method employs only a small number of workpieces to perform the similarity comparison and the data obtained will be used to infer the similarity data of other workpieces in order to form a workpiece similarity matrix. With the aid of such a similarity matrix, one can perform the workpiece classification. To enhance the effectiveness of the lean clustering method and to extend its applicability, the study investigated this issue with regards to the following three aspects: 1. add the hypothesis of skew-to-left, centralised, and skew-to-right workpiece distribution patterns in addition to the uniform distribution of workpiece similarity; 2. beside the most commonly used max-min method, apply the Hamming method, interval average method, and weighting method to the workpiece similarity inference; 3. compare the effectiveness of rough classification and fine classification in lean clustering method. The results revealed that there is no significant difference among the four similarity distribution patterns and among the four similarity inference methods. However, the degree of consistency can reach up to 89% when the rough classification is used for workpiece classification. The authors, therefore, suggest that there is no need to test the similarity distribution in advance, in application of lean clustering method when the rough classification will be used for the classification task of a large number of workpieces so as to reduce the cost.

Suggested Citation

  • T.C. Hsia, S.H. Hsu, W.Y. Huang, M.C. Wu, 2000. "Enhancing the effectiveness of lean clustering in establishing benchmarks for automatic classification systems," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2/3), pages 288-317.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:1:y:2000:i:2/3:p:288-317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=1340
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:1:y:2000:i:2/3:p:288-317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.