IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmore/v9y2016i1p39-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stepwise explicit solution for the joint distribution of queue length of a MAP single-server service queueing system with splitting and varying batch size delayed-feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Aliakbar Montazer Haghighi
  • Dimitar P. Mishev

Abstract

Applying truncation, augmentation and tridiagonalisation on infinite block matrices with infinite block matrix elements and duality properties of G/M/1 and M/G/1, and considering two Poisson arrivals as a MAP queueing network, we develop a stepwise algorithm to explicitly compute the joint distribution of the number of tasks in a system (queue length). We believe it is the first time such a development is offered in the literature. The system consists of an infinite-buffer single-server service-station, a splitter and an infinite-buffer single-mover delay-station. Tasks arrive from two sources: singly from outside and by batch from inside, the delay-station to the service-station. Both types of tasks arrive according to a Poisson process with two different parameters. Batch sizes vary between a minimum and a maximum number. A numerical example that demonstrates when the algorithm works and how the parameters must be chosen to reduce the approximation error together with an error analysis is included.

Suggested Citation

  • Aliakbar Montazer Haghighi & Dimitar P. Mishev, 2016. "Stepwise explicit solution for the joint distribution of queue length of a MAP single-server service queueing system with splitting and varying batch size delayed-feedback," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 39-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:9:y:2016:i:1:p:39-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=77557
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:9:y:2016:i:1:p:39-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=320 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.