IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmore/v30y2025i1p111-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The synthesis of the AHP as a well-posed mathematical problem and matrix norms appropriate for sensitivity analysis via condition number

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Benitez Alvarez
  • Rafael Guimarães de Almeida
  • Cecília Toledo Hernández
  • Patrícia Alves Pereira de Sousa

Abstract

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a decision-making method, which has as its greatest criticism the rank reversal effect. This paper formulates the fourth step of the AHP (synthesis) as a 'well-posed' mathematical problem. A theorem guarantees the existence of the square condensed original formulation for the AHP. This means that any decision problem modelled by AHP with a different number of alternatives and criteria can be condensed into a model with an equal number of alternatives and criteria without loss of condensed information. This condensed formulation can be better conditioned than the original rectangular formulation of the AHP. The square condensed equivalent formulation is also a 'well-posed' mathematical problem. The concepts are applied to two practical cases from the literature, and sensitivity analysis is performed. Four classical matrix norms are reformulated to obtain theoretical bounds for the error estimate closer to actual error.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Benitez Alvarez & Rafael Guimarães de Almeida & Cecília Toledo Hernández & Patrícia Alves Pereira de Sousa, 2025. "The synthesis of the AHP as a well-posed mathematical problem and matrix norms appropriate for sensitivity analysis via condition number," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(1), pages 111-134.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:30:y:2025:i:1:p:111-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=144549
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:30:y:2025:i:1:p:111-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=320 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.