IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmore/v2y2010i4p387-404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A group decision-making method for target setting in data envelopment analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Reza Kiani Mavi
  • Ahmad Makui
  • Alireza Alinezhad

Abstract

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) and multiple objective linear programming (MOLP) are tools that can be used in management control and planning. Whilst these two types of model are similar in structure, DEA is directed to assessing past performances as part of management control function and MOLP to planning future performance targets. This article is devoted to investigating equivalent models and interactive tradeoff analysis procedures in MOLP, such that DEA-oriented performance assessment and target setting can be integrated in a way that the decision-makers' preferences can be taken into account in an interactive fashion. In addition, in this article a new target-setting DEA approach is proposed. In this method, the decision-makers are asked to say which inputs and outputs they wish to improve, which ones are allowed to worsen and which ones should stay at their current level for inefficient decision-making units (DMUs). The relative priorities of these inputs and outputs are computed using the group analytic hierarchy process. By solving a proper mathematical model, the amount of increase or decrease for each input or output can be obtained. After doing this amount of increase or decrease, the observed inefficient DMU transforms into an efficient one.

Suggested Citation

  • Reza Kiani Mavi & Ahmad Makui & Alireza Alinezhad, 2010. "A group decision-making method for target setting in data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(4), pages 387-404.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:2:y:2010:i:4:p:387-404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=33436
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:2:y:2010:i:4:p:387-404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=320 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.