IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmore/v1y2009i1-2p97-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value functions and trade-offs associated with the analytic hierarchy process composition law

Author

Listed:
  • Marvin D. Troutt
  • Suresh K. Tadisina
  • Parag C. Pendharkar

Abstract

In this article, we provide a fresh bridge between the original formulation of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the more classical theory of value functions. We focus on the hierarchic composition law (HCL) as a device for aggregation. Multi-attribute value functions can be similarly described. We derive a class of fundamental functional equations which relate the priorities construct of the AHP to a particular value function. It is therefore possible to associate a class of trade-off or indifference curves to the HCL by this technique. Our results indicate that the number of alternatives being compared in the AHP is the main cause of rank reversal. We show that different numbers of alternatives determine different trade-off curve systems, and hence necessarily, different value functions. Two classical cases of rank reversal, on account of alternative addition and deletion, respectively, are reexamined for illustration. The rank reversal can be resolved in both cases by this methodology. The results obtained here establish a link between the original AHP formulation using the HCL and multi-attribute value function theory, with promise of more positive mutual benefit between the topics in the future. In particular, the value function class associated with the HCL has a number of desirable features.

Suggested Citation

  • Marvin D. Troutt & Suresh K. Tadisina & Parag C. Pendharkar, 2009. "Value functions and trade-offs associated with the analytic hierarchy process composition law," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 97-120.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:1:y:2009:i:1/2:p:97-120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=22877
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:1:y:2009:i:1/2:p:97-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=320 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.