IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmore/v13y2018i4p513-532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the productivity changes with double frontiers data envelopment analysis for two-stage processes

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Mohtashami
  • Alireza Alinezhad
  • Mohammad Javad Nasiri Sadeghloo

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to develop an output oriented methodology with constant return to scale (CRS) assumption for calculating productivity changes by using double frontier (optimistic and pessimistic) data envelopment analysis (DEA) simultaneously for two-stage processes. Measuring the productivity changes with Malmquist productivity index (MPI) via double frontiers DEA with single process has been defined by Wang and Lan (2011) as a geometrically average of optimistic and pessimistic point of views to generate an aggregate MPI. In order to develop and modify the previous studies, in this paper we have proposed a method to modify Wang and Lan (2011) aggregate MPI and also extend it to two-stage process which we refer to the double frontiers two-stage DEA (DFTDEA). It should be mentioned that the proposed model of this paper measures the MPI's distance functions for two individual stages and whole process for both DEA different points of view by the traditional DEA models and supposed relational models in output oriented CCR models, respectively. Therefore, the identified double frontiers two-stage DEA (DFTDEA-based MPI) is more realistic and comprehensive than the conventional optimistic or pessimistic DEA-based MPI individually. Subsequently, the proposed approach is examined to five Iranian commercial banks over the five-year period, 2009-2013.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Mohtashami & Alireza Alinezhad & Mohammad Javad Nasiri Sadeghloo, 2018. "Measuring the productivity changes with double frontiers data envelopment analysis for two-stage processes," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(4), pages 513-532.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:13:y:2018:i:4:p:513-532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=95488
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:13:y:2018:i:4:p:513-532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=320 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.