IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmore/v10y2017i2p167-189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ant colony optimisation for impatient customer queue under N-policy and Bernoulli schedule vacation interruption

Author

Listed:
  • P. Vijaya Laxmi
  • S. Indira

Abstract

This paper analyses a finite buffer multiple working vacations queue with balking, reneging and Bernoulli schedule vacation interruption under N-policy. Arriving customer decide either to join the system or to balk. After joining the queue, the customer may renege. The server leaves for working vacation after serving the queue exhaustively. At a service completion instant during working vacation, the server continue the vacation with probability q or if there are at least N customers in the queue the server interrupts the vacation and resumes regular service with probability 1 − q. The inter-arrival times of customers are assumed to be arbitrarily distributed. Service times during a regular service period, during a working vacation period and vacation times are assumed to be exponentially distributed and are mutually independent. Using recursive technique, the steady state system length distributions at various epochs are obtained. Some performance measures of the model and cost analysis using ant colony optimisation are presented. Finally, numerical results showing the effect of model parameters on key performance measures are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Vijaya Laxmi & S. Indira, 2017. "Ant colony optimisation for impatient customer queue under N-policy and Bernoulli schedule vacation interruption," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 167-189.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:167-189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=81923
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmore:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:167-189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=320 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.