IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmede/v23y2024i2p117-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of key factors of Industry 4.0 development from the perspective of R&D organisations using the Delphi method

Author

Listed:
  • Ľubica Kotorová Slušná
  • Miroslav Balog
  • Dušana Dokupilová

Abstract

Various measures have been introduced to bring together businesses and scholars. This study aims to identify the critical factors for the progress of Industry 4.0, and the ability to cooperate with businesses from the perspective of Slovak public research and development organisations using the classical Delphi method. Two rounds of the Delphi method were performed. The interquartile ratio measured consensus among experts; the mean determined whether the factor could be considered critical; and the difference in the coefficients of variation was used as a measure of the stability of answers between rounds. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) matrix factors were grouped into four categories: framework conditions, technology, human resources, and cooperation. Of the 63 factors included in our SWOT matrix, only two acquired mean ratings lower than moderate. This suggests that to exploit the potential of Industry 4.0, an innovation ecosystem perspective that captures various areas is crucial.

Suggested Citation

  • Ľubica Kotorová Slušná & Miroslav Balog & Dušana Dokupilová, 2024. "Identification of key factors of Industry 4.0 development from the perspective of R&D organisations using the Delphi method," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(2), pages 117-135.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmede:v:23:y:2024:i:2:p:117-135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=139271
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmede:v:23:y:2024:i:2:p:117-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=89 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.