IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v4y2003i4p337-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing decision trees with multiple response variables

Author

Listed:
  • Seong-Jun Kim
  • Kang Bae Lee

Abstract

Data mining is a process of discovering meaningful patterns in large data sets that are useful for decision making and has recently received an amount of attention in a wide range of business and engineering fields. Decision tree, also known as recursive partitioning or rule induction, is one of the most frequently used methods for data mining. A decision tree, on a divide-and-conquer basis, provides a set of rules for classifying samples in the learning data set. Most of works on decision tree have been conducted for the case of single response variable. However, situations where multiple response variables should be considered arise from many applications, for example, manufacturing process monitoring, customer management, and clinical and health analysis. This article concerns constructing decision trees when there are two or more response variables in the data set. In this article, we investigate node homogeneity criteria such as entropy and Gini index and then present three approaches to constructing decision trees with multiple response variables. To do so, we first describe extensions of entropy and a Gini index to the case in which multiple response variables are of concern. A weighting method for node splitting is also explained. Next, we present a decision tree minimising an expected loss due to misclassifications. To illustrate the procedures, numerical examples are given with discussions.

Suggested Citation

  • Seong-Jun Kim & Kang Bae Lee, 2003. "Constructing decision trees with multiple response variables," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 337-353.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:4:y:2003:i:4:p:337-353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=3998
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:4:y:2003:i:4:p:337-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.