IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v23y2024i6p665-700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A quantitative risk assessment framework for reverse logistics of plastic packaging wastes via a multi-stage intuitionistic fuzzy information: a case study of plastic recycling industry in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Detcharat Sumrit
  • Jirawat Keeratibhubordee

Abstract

This study proposes a failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) framework to assess the RL risks of plastic packaging wastes by using a multi-stage intuitionistic fuzzy. Firstly, the 11 failure modes of RL are identified through extensive literature review and validated by industrial experts. Next, the subjective and objective weighting of FMEA risk criteria are computed using decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and entropy approaches, respectively. Subsequently, the subjective and objective weightings are used to obtain the combination weighing of FM risk criteria. Next, the 11 failure modes are ranked using combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS). Lastly, the sensitivity analysis is performed to validate the reliability and robustness of the proposed framework. The plastic packaging recycling industry in Thailand is used as a case study. The findings of this study provide useful insights for academics and practitioners to make risk assessment decisions in the reverse logistics system.

Suggested Citation

  • Detcharat Sumrit & Jirawat Keeratibhubordee, 2024. "A quantitative risk assessment framework for reverse logistics of plastic packaging wastes via a multi-stage intuitionistic fuzzy information: a case study of plastic recycling industry in Thailand," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(6), pages 665-700.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:23:y:2024:i:6:p:665-700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=141897
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:23:y:2024:i:6:p:665-700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.