IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v11y2010i2p105-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating mobile game prospects – perspective of a game publisher

Author

Listed:
  • Petri Hallikainen
  • Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen
  • Janne Vihinen

Abstract

The mobile gaming industry is undergoing a transformation from SMS based games to downloadable and multi media card (MMC) games. The game developers do not have the same financial resources for developing new services as a few years ago. Current development budgets are much lower and mobile game developers have to concentrate development activities to games which can generate revenue. In this paper, we examine the key decision making criteria for new game selection of a mobile game publisher and propose a tentative framework for the evaluation of new mobile product prospects in the game and entertainment industry. The preferences for the criteria are derived by applying the principles of the analytic hierarchy process method. We took the results of the chief executive officer's interview as the basis for the analysis on how the company chooses between competing new game initiatives, but we also interviewed the chief technology officer and a producer in the company to achieve a better understanding on why some criteria are more important than others. The results show that the case company emphasises expected profit and volume more than risk factors in decision making, although they also search for proven game concepts and rely on seasonal products with low risk of not having enough sales volume.

Suggested Citation

  • Petri Hallikainen & Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen & Janne Vihinen, 2010. "Evaluating mobile game prospects – perspective of a game publisher," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 105-120.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:11:y:2010:i:2:p:105-120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=35212
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:11:y:2010:i:2:p:105-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.