IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v5y2011i2p159-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The postsocialist experience and the resistible learning process of economic science

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Chavance

Abstract

The paper gives a critical assessment of the reaction of various trends of economics, when confronted with the diversified experience of postsocialist transformation and accompanying surprises, like the initial depression, the unexpected consequences of fast privatisation, or the unconventional policies and performance of China and Vietnam. It discusses the mainstream transition doctrine, and its gradual qualification, as well as institutionalist and evolutionary approaches of the systemic transformation problems. It concludes that this grand and painful historical experience has until now failed to substantially modify mainstream economics, even though its unfolding has strongly questioned the latter's theoretical and methodological premises.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Chavance, 2011. "The postsocialist experience and the resistible learning process of economic science," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 159-170.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:5:y:2011:i:2:p:159-170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=41520
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pascal Grouiez & Petia Koleva, 2018. "Transforming the Diary Sector in Post-Communist Economies : actors and strategies," Post-Print hal-02615864, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:5:y:2011:i:2:p:159-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.