IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcdm/v3y2013i2-3p212-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dominance-based rough set approach and analytic network process for assessing urban transformation scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Abastante
  • Marta Bottero
  • Salvatore Greco
  • Isabella M. Lami

Abstract

The paper shows the contribution that two different multiple criteria decision aiding (MCDA) methods could provide in the field of strategic decisions and urban and territorial planning. In particular, the analytic network process and the dominance-based rough set approach have been considered and discussed in the work with reference to their role in supporting such decision-making processes, trying to compare the different contributions given by the two approaches in this specific domain of application.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Abastante & Marta Bottero & Salvatore Greco & Isabella M. Lami, 2013. "Dominance-based rough set approach and analytic network process for assessing urban transformation scenarios," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2/3), pages 212-235.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:3:y:2013:i:2/3:p:212-235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=53728
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Copiello, Sergio, 2016. "Leveraging energy efficiency to finance public-private social housing projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 217-230.
    2. Oppio, Alessandra & Dell’Ovo, Marta & Torrieri, Francesca & Miebs, Grzegorz & Kadziński, Miłosz, 2020. "Understanding the drivers of Urban Development Agreements with the rough set approach and robust decision rules," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:3:y:2013:i:2/3:p:212-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=350 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.