IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlsma/v45y2023i1p31-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-criteria approach for inventory classification and effective warehouse management

Author

Listed:
  • Birol Elevli
  • Ali Dinler

Abstract

Organisations classically employ the ABC analysis to have efficient control on the inventory items and for effective management of warehouses. This method usually considers sales values and usage volume of inventory items. In our study, in order to take into account more than one criterion, the PROMETHEE method, which is one of the pairwise comparisons MCDM methods, was used. For the inventory classification, five criteria have been identified that affect the storage activities for all products in order to determine the importance of the product types and product models which are produced by the company. Products were ranked according to their priorities using the PROMETHEE method. The results of the classification were used to assign the shelves to products in the storage. In this process, the top products are assigned to the closer places to minimise the transport distance. As a result of the inventory classification and storage layout plan, the usage rate of storage area has been increased and a layout plan which minimises transportation distances has been established. In this way, order picking and order shipment processes have been accelerated, and a more systematic approach has been created for warehouse management of the company.

Suggested Citation

  • Birol Elevli & Ali Dinler, 2023. "Multi-criteria approach for inventory classification and effective warehouse management," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 45(1), pages 31-49.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:45:y:2023:i:1:p:31-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=130969
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:45:y:2023:i:1:p:31-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=134 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.