IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlsma/v43y2022i3p354-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lean/experience feedback for sustainable logistics management within Industry 4.0 perspective: a new approach based on survey study evidence in Morocco

Author

Listed:
  • Salima Hammadi
  • Brahim Herrou

Abstract

Industrial performance has become the main aim of production systems regarding the actual competitiveness pressure, industrial development and environment constraints. Hence, dealing with maintenance from a logistics vision to define maintenance logistics system is a new promising framework boosting availability improvement and industrial performance. A survey study was conducted in the Moroccan industrial context to evaluate industrials' perception about lean implementation benefits in maintenance logistics, concluding its positive impact on four fields of benefit; among others maintenance logistics environment and human factor culture which is considered the most difficult to align on the lean culture. In addition, the human factor perspective, being an important key to reach sustainable performance, still stays poorly exploited in maintenance area. To activate the human factor potential, we define the sustainable maintenance logistics framework covering all maintenance resources. To this end, we propose a new sustainable map integrating lean culture and experience feedback within Industry 4.0 perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Salima Hammadi & Brahim Herrou, 2022. "Lean/experience feedback for sustainable logistics management within Industry 4.0 perspective: a new approach based on survey study evidence in Morocco," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 43(3), pages 354-365.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:43:y:2022:i:3:p:354-365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=127083
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:43:y:2022:i:3:p:354-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=134 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.