IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlsma/v37y2020i1p55-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the impact of containership size on port demand and infrastructure development: a case study of the Busan hub port

Author

Listed:
  • Gun-Woo Lee
  • Chan-Young Jun
  • Hokey Min
  • Min-Kyu Lee

Abstract

In parallel with the continuous growth of international trade, the size of containerships has grown rapidly over the last several decades. The rationale being that the larger the capacity of a containership, the lower the shipping cost per TEU and the greater the shipping volume it can handle. The increased use of larger containerships, however, causes serious concerns for many ports around the world, since the existing port infrastructure and shipping network configurations are not designed to handle mega-containerships such as post-Panamax containerships. One of those concerns includes the vicious circle of never-ending port capacity expansion following the vessel size arms race. To ease such concern, the port authority should develop wise port development and reconfiguration strategies, which can accommodate the need for larger vessels and subsequently increase port revenue while minimising the financial burden associated with port development and reconfiguration. With this in mind, we examined whether the port's ability to handle larger containerships had any impact on its attractiveness for inducing greater demand based on the case study of the Busan hub port in Korea.

Suggested Citation

  • Gun-Woo Lee & Chan-Young Jun & Hokey Min & Min-Kyu Lee, 2020. "Assessing the impact of containership size on port demand and infrastructure development: a case study of the Busan hub port," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 37(1), pages 55-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:37:y:2020:i:1:p:55-78
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=109653
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:37:y:2020:i:1:p:55-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=134 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.