IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlsma/v34y2019i1p75-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors affecting police station efficiency: DEA in police logistics

Author

Listed:
  • Zilla Sinuany-Stern
  • Doron Alper

Abstract

This study identifies factors affecting police station performance in Israel. In the first stage, data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used to measure the relative efficiency of 60 police stations, based on two inputs and 16 outputs, including several logistic parameters. In the second stage, a cross-efficiency (CE) measure was then used to rank-scale police stations. We show that CE, which is calculated as the average of its evaluations using the weights of all stations, has a normal distribution. In the third stage, multiple regressions were performed to verify the effect of various logistic and environmental factors on CE efficiency (from the second stage). We found that one logistical factor, the number of vehicles of the population in a station's jurisdiction, was statistically significant. We show that the use of CE in the regression analysis offers a novel approach for dealing with stochastic DEA.

Suggested Citation

  • Zilla Sinuany-Stern & Doron Alper, 2019. "Factors affecting police station efficiency: DEA in police logistics," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 34(1), pages 75-101.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:34:y:2019:i:1:p:75-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=102064
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sinuany-Stern, Zilla, 2023. "Foundations of operations research: From linear programming to data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1069-1080.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:34:y:2019:i:1:p:75-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=134 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.