IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlsma/v33y2019i4p497-524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced optimal inventory control policies of perishable products in a retail business: a comparative simulation study under different cost structures

Author

Listed:
  • Naleak Heng
  • Navee Chiadamrong

Abstract

This paper experiments different replenishment policies of perishable products using simulation-based optimisation approach. The main contribution of this study is to recommend the best replenishment policy and whether enhancing a typical periodic review policy can lead to a better outcome. It was found that enhancing a typical periodic review policy with a backroom and a reorder level can lead to a higher net profit. In some instances, integrating both of them together can outperform implementing them alone, as they can complement each other. The finding also suggests that enhancing the base policy by screening out bad items before reaching the customers may not be so cost-effective if the removed items cannot be sold to generate extra revenue or the loss of goodwill is not the main concern. These findings can help shop managers to make right decisions on the optimal inventory policy in a certain situation under an uncertain environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Naleak Heng & Navee Chiadamrong, 2019. "Enhanced optimal inventory control policies of perishable products in a retail business: a comparative simulation study under different cost structures," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 33(4), pages 497-524.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:33:y:2019:i:4:p:497-524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=101795
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:33:y:2019:i:4:p:497-524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=134 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.