IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlsma/v32y2019i2p272-290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodical analysis of inventory discrepancy under conditions of uncertainty in supply chain management

Author

Listed:
  • Nebil Buyurgan
  • Shengfan Zhang
  • H. Kaan Okyay

Abstract

This study presents two compensations methods for inventory discrepancy caused by demand, supply and lead time uncertainty as well as inventory related errors. The first method increases the resistance of supply chain by incrementing safety stock levels while the second method controls and corrects inventory discrepancy based on estimated errors. System-level errors are categorised and modelled under the best and the worst possible conditions to characterise and investigate the behaviour of discrepancy between on-hand and recorded inventory in a supply chain. Numerical analyses are performed to observe inventory and discrepancy behaviour to quantify the benefits of the methods. The results indicate that inventory errors can be characterised as an extra source of demand in supply chain. Incrementing the safety stocks based on inventory records can decrease stock-outs and lost sales but increase the level of on-hand inventory. Controlling and correcting inventory discrepancies, however, keeps low inventory.

Suggested Citation

  • Nebil Buyurgan & Shengfan Zhang & H. Kaan Okyay, 2019. "Methodical analysis of inventory discrepancy under conditions of uncertainty in supply chain management," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 32(2), pages 272-290.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:32:y:2019:i:2:p:272-290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=97587
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:32:y:2019:i:2:p:272-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=134 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.