IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlsma/v31y2018i1p132-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal number of suppliers to mitigate supply disruption: a case of Indian locomotive manufacturer

Author

Listed:
  • Rajnish Kumar
  • Sidhartha S. Padhi
  • Ashutosh Sarkar

Abstract

Dependencies over supplier for efficient functioning of firms are evident in academic literature as well as in practice. However, disruption in supplies can hinder the entire manufacturing process. This article applies a mathematical model through modifying the work of Berger et al. (2004) to determine the optimal number of suppliers required under supply disruptions and also used quantity discounts offered by suppliers on volume purchases. The model is demonstrated by means of an Indian locomotive manufacturer as a case study. We consider supply disruptions due to the probability of occurrence of super, semi-super, and unique events in the supply chain. Furthermore, the analysis has been extended to study the semi-super events, in which only a particular region of supplier is affected. Results have shown that the optimal number of suppliers is three for low cost items and two for the costlier ones. This article will be helpful for efficient managerial decision making for materials management and purchasing practitioners, besides academicians for better understanding of such concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajnish Kumar & Sidhartha S. Padhi & Ashutosh Sarkar, 2018. "Optimal number of suppliers to mitigate supply disruption: a case of Indian locomotive manufacturer," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(1), pages 132-149.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:31:y:2018:i:1:p:132-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=94194
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:31:y:2018:i:1:p:132-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=134 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.