IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlsma/v29y2018i3p271-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimising the location of a hub port in Thailand for arrival of Dawei and Pakbara ports

Author

Listed:
  • Sakaradhorn Boontaveeyuwat

Abstract

This paper considers a hub port selection problem for Thailand by evaluating the Dawei and Pakbara ports based on expected hub competition among other existing major ports in Southeast Asia that focus on servicing the local demands for container transport in Thailand. The infrastructure capability of ports in handling containers at berths is also analysed. The cargo supply and demand come from several ports in the world considered as the origin and destination points for 76 provinces in Thailand. A mixed integer programming model is developed to minimise the total system costs, taking into account vessel operating cost, port cost and inland logistics cost considered as three modes of transport: road, waterway-road and rail-road modes. In total, the model consists of 26,755 decision variables, five integer variables and 82,690 constraints. The results show that the two foreign ports (Port Klang and Singapore ports) are a better choice than the two new arrivals (Pakbara and Dawei ports) for serving Thailand local demands and are close runners up to Laem Chabang port.

Suggested Citation

  • Sakaradhorn Boontaveeyuwat, 2018. "Optimising the location of a hub port in Thailand for arrival of Dawei and Pakbara ports," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 29(3), pages 271-295.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:29:y:2018:i:3:p:271-295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=89788
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:29:y:2018:i:3:p:271-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=134 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.