IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlsma/v27y2017i2p208-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land transportation assets' potential future trends and the third party logistics providers in emerging markets, with a case study applied in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas Tacla
  • Rui Carlos Botter

Abstract

This paper looks at third party logistics (3PL) asset strategy options for land transportation in emerging markets through a case study of truck operations in Brazil. The fundamental question to be answered is: what is the preferred business model for a 3PL provider in emerging markets regarding asset ownership? That is, is it preferable for the 3PL to own and operate trucks? An opinion survey was deployed and analysed using statistical methods in association with market trend and financial aspects, interpreting the data in line with concepts identified through a literature review concerning the theme. This study is motivated by the challenges and decisions that the 3PL faces nowadays: whether to act as an integrator, managing and/or owning assets; or develop a business as a Leader Logistic Provider (LLP) managing third parties and/or outsourcing services. Moreover, global companies must integrate their business model in emerging markets with their global strategy. The results indicate that asset ownership may be a good strategy to access specific niches or enter a particular market, but this is not the current tendency of the logistics industry in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas Tacla & Rui Carlos Botter, 2017. "Land transportation assets' potential future trends and the third party logistics providers in emerging markets, with a case study applied in Brazil," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 27(2), pages 208-224.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:27:y:2017:i:2:p:208-224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=83817
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:27:y:2017:i:2:p:208-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=134 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.