IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlica/v8y2011i1p30-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enabling innovation in knowledge worker teams

Author

Listed:
  • Aino Kianto

Abstract

Innovation and knowledge creation are processes, which require intensive collaboration of several people. Nevertheless, the constituents of successful collaboration in innovation activities are not well-known, and the understanding of the inherently social processes by which new intangibles are created is still in its infancy. This paper examines the key facilitators of innovation in knowledge-intensive group-level collaboration based on empirical evidence. The results demonstrate that social factors are highly influential for knowledge worker teams' ability to produce innovations. Teams whose internal processes were characterised by trust, vision, aim for excellence, participative safety and support for innovation were likely to attain high levels of innovation. Team diversity based on highly visible attributes was found to be negatively related with team innovation. Surprisingly, also external collaboration seemed to affect team innovation outcomes negatively, except for when it was aimed at general scanning for ideas and information. In addition, the differences between the more and the less innovative teams arose mainly from differences in their internal interaction processes, rather than patterns of collaboration with people outside the team.

Suggested Citation

  • Aino Kianto, 2011. "Enabling innovation in knowledge worker teams," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 30-49.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:30-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=37357
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristina Reineke & Holger Steinmetz & Rodrigo Isidor, 2020. "Diversity, Team Mechanisms, and Performance: A Meta-Analytical Test of an Opposing Path Model," Working Papers Dissertations 61, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:30-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=86 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.