IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlica/v21y2024i2p115-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder analysis as tool for organisational learning in social services: does internal social capital play a role?

Author

Listed:
  • Nataša Rupčić
  • Matej Babšek

Abstract

This paper addresses the importance of stakeholder analysis as a tool for organisational learning in public organisations, with an emphasis on internal social capital as a facilitator of organisational change. In a case study of a Slovenian social service, the aim of the research was to determine if and to what extent social services conduct stakeholder analysis and use it in their organisational learning and what role internal social capital plays in this process. The results show that despite the fact that stakeholder analysis, organisational learning and internal social capital are present and well developed in the organisation, no significant relationship was found between these variables. The qualitative analysis revealed that the reason lies in the role and relationship with the ministry, on which the SWC's decision-making is heavily dependent. In this way, the paper identifies an important external impediment to organisational learning and change in a public organisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nataša Rupčić & Matej Babšek, 2024. "Stakeholder analysis as tool for organisational learning in social services: does internal social capital play a role?," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(2), pages 115-149.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:115-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=137574
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:115-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=86 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.