IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlica/v11y2014i2p166-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intellectual capital disclosure from literature perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Nicoleta Maria Ienciu

Abstract

This paper reviews the empirical research literature from different methodological strands and summarises the findings to provide evidence on the importance of IC for an economic entity from literature perspective. The purpose of this paper is to review the use of content analysis on one side and the questionnaire surveys on the other side as two popular research methods utilised by the intellectual capital disclosure (ICD) literature. Refereed papers were selected from literature wherein the content analysis and the questionnaire surveys were developed. The findings suggest that the literature highlights a plethora of studies with focus on ICD wherein the use of content analysis and questionnaire as research methods facilitate the understanding of ICD practice. The present paper provides a framework of ICD literature in order to inform future research in the field and to help managers understand the impact/usefulness of ICD.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicoleta Maria Ienciu, 2014. "Intellectual capital disclosure from literature perspective," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 166-183.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:166-183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=60808
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Rieg & Ute Vanini, 2023. "Value relevance of voluntary intellectual capital disclosure: a meta-analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2587-2631, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:166-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=86 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.