IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijkbde/v12y2021i1p17-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-production in public management: a case study towards a smart city

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Schreiner
  • Mariângela Poleza
  • Eduardo Moreira Da Costa

Abstract

This paper aims to analyse an initiative of a multidisciplinary group that co-produced guidelines for interventions in a public park, under the lens of the multidimensional smart city framework proposed by Yigitcanlar et al. (2018). For this analysis we used the action research method to collectively create solutions for this city asset. With the results, it is possible to state that the group's work took place as a collective co-production. Regarding the framework proposal, the community represented the mobilising force which contributed to another driver's development, public policies; whereas the technology aspect had a modest representation as a tool. In the group members evaluation, the perceived value of collective work stood out. The action research methodology was adequate, converging with the co-production and smart cities stages presented in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Schreiner & Mariângela Poleza & Eduardo Moreira Da Costa, 2021. "Co-production in public management: a case study towards a smart city," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 17-34.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijkbde:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:17-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=119046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María Teresa Bastanchury-López & Carmen De-Pablos-Heredero, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis on Smart Cities Related to Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijkbde:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:17-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=354 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.