IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijitma/v12y2013i3-4p298-319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisational knowledge management capability: a multi case study

Author

Listed:
  • Abdullah Kammani
  • Hema Date
  • Nisar Hundewale

Abstract

Literature concerning knowledge management (KM) and its effectiveness or capability does various attempts and discussion on concepts namely, explicit and tacit knowledge, knowledge work, knowledge worker, knowledge assets and knowledge infrastructure, etc., but none of the extant studies could elaborate the applicability of these components in an organisation to achieve a knowledge management capability from a real time perspective. So this research gap asks some important research question viz.: 1) What are the components of a KM capability in an organisation? 2) What are the characteristics of these components? 3) Which is the most important component of an organisational KM capability? These issues necessitate a multi-case study to explore the components and characteristics that influence the achievement of KM capability in a knowledge intensive firm. The results confirm the proposed model and suggest that KM capability is mandated in knowledge intensive firm, and its consequences can be classified in to two major types of outcome, such as 'immediate benefits' and 'final outcome'. Study implications, limitations and suggestions for future research are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdullah Kammani & Hema Date & Nisar Hundewale, 2013. "Organisational knowledge management capability: a multi case study," International Journal of Information Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3/4), pages 298-319.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijitma:v:12:y:2013:i:3/4:p:298-319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=54798
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijitma:v:12:y:2013:i:3/4:p:298-319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=18 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.