IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisen/v8y2011i3p346-365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supplier evaluation and selection for a manufacturing industry using analytical hierarchy process – a case study

Author

Listed:
  • N. Arunkumar
  • L. Karunamoorthy
  • S. Muthukumar

Abstract

Supplier selection is one of the most critical activities of purchasing because of the key role of supplier's performance on cost, quality, delivery and service. Depending on the purchasing situation, the criteria have varying importance and there is a need to weight criteria. Practically in supplier selection problems, most of the input information is not known precisely. An analytical way to reach the best decision is more preferable in many such business platforms. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is one of the best ways for deciding among the complex criteria in different levels. AHP converts the qualitative factors of suppliers into quantitative measure reliably. This paper suggests the use of AHP, one of the strong methods in multi-criteria decision making to evaluate and select the supplier using criteria such as quality, cost, delivery, service, technology, capacity, reliability, lead-time and responsiveness. Here 9 attributes, 27 sub-attributes and 7 alternatives are evaluated to select the best among them. Case study on supplier selection for a leading textile machinery manufacturing industry in South India is presented in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Arunkumar & L. Karunamoorthy & S. Muthukumar, 2011. "Supplier evaluation and selection for a manufacturing industry using analytical hierarchy process – a case study," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(3), pages 346-365.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:8:y:2011:i:3:p:346-365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=41542
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:8:y:2011:i:3:p:346-365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=188 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.