IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisen/v4y2009i2p174-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contractor selection with Multi Criteria Decision Support tools

Author

Listed:
  • Adil Baykasoglu
  • Erdogan Ozbay
  • M. Tolga Gogus
  • Ahmet Oztas

Abstract

The selection of the most suitable contractor is crucial for the success of construction projects. An important task in contractor selection is to establish a set of decision criteria that can measure and judge the capabilities of contractors. Multiple Criteria Decision Support (MCDS) methods can be very useful to solve this problem. Several MCDS tools are used in the literature for this problem. In order to promote the usage of these methods a set of them are applied to a real problem. It is also aimed to present the relative performances, advantages and disadvantages of these methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Adil Baykasoglu & Erdogan Ozbay & M. Tolga Gogus & Ahmet Oztas, 2009. "Contractor selection with Multi Criteria Decision Support tools," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 174-197.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:174-197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=22371
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masoud Rabbani & Reza Yazdanparast & Mahdi Mobini, 2019. "An algorithm for performance evaluation of resilience engineering culture based on graph theory and matrix approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(2), pages 228-241, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:4:y:2009:i:2:p:174-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=188 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.