IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisen/v38y2021i3p263-290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maintenance strategy decision applying analytic network process in industries: a comparative study

Author

Listed:
  • Mary C. Kurian
  • P.R. Shalij
  • V.R. Pramod
  • C.P. Sunilkumar

Abstract

To enhance the availability, reliability and safety of equipment, it is essential for the industries to implement an efficient maintenance program. This research paper illustrates and compares the maintenance strategies of two different types of industries and compares the results. The analytic network process (ANP) method is applied in two industries for maintenance strategy choice which is an innovative and effective method for solving decision problems involving multiple criteria with interdependence relations. In order to explicate the difference between the maintenance strategies adopted by various industries, ANP method is applied in a tyre industry and in a steel industry for strategy selection and the results are compared. Comparison of these results proves that ANP is an effective technique in multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for solving problems having interdependence relations having significant impact (Cheng et al., 2005) and reactive maintenance (RM) is the most preferred alternative for the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary C. Kurian & P.R. Shalij & V.R. Pramod & C.P. Sunilkumar, 2021. "Maintenance strategy decision applying analytic network process in industries: a comparative study," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 38(3), pages 263-290.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:38:y:2021:i:3:p:263-290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=116247
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:38:y:2021:i:3:p:263-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=188 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.