IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisen/v37y2021i2p265-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling and comparison of three echelon production-inventory supply chain models for a deteriorating product with and without backlogging

Author

Listed:
  • B.J. Sreejith
  • T. Radha Ramanan

Abstract

We consider a production inventory problem of a deteriorating product that begins to deteriorate immediately on production. Two models of three echelon supply chain are developed whose rate of demand, production and deterioration are assumed to be constant. The second model allows backlogging of the demand, while the first model does not allow backlogging. In both models, the producer's cycle starts with zero stock and the production continues till the stock level reaches an optimal value. There will be demand and deterioration and consequently stock level falls to zero during the non-production phase. The demand subsequently received is backordered in the second model and a fraction of it is met by restarting the production process. Optimal lot sizes of distributor and retailer is identified within each of the producer's cycle. A numerical example is illustrated. Comparison between the models shows that backordering reduces the total supply chain cost.

Suggested Citation

  • B.J. Sreejith & T. Radha Ramanan, 2021. "Modelling and comparison of three echelon production-inventory supply chain models for a deteriorating product with and without backlogging," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 37(2), pages 265-282.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:37:y:2021:i:2:p:265-282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=112879
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:37:y:2021:i:2:p:265-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=188 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.