IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisen/v30y2018i3p387-400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The new ranking method of the decision making units in DEA: with an approach to modifying the cross efficiency method

Author

Listed:
  • Behzad Paryzad
  • Esmaeil Najafi
  • Hamed Kazemipoor
  • Nasser Shahsavari Pour

Abstract

There is no doubt that organisations need an operation evaluation and measurement for having more efficiency and an optimal usage of their limited sources. One of the most practical methods for evaluating the operation is using the data envelopment analysis. Hence, data envelopment analysis (DEA) and ranking decision making units (DMU) are the most favourite subjects for the researchers. This method has modified on a different style on this article that has removed the existence of multiple optimal answers in the CCR (Chames-Cooper and Rhodes). In other words, the acquired ranks of the units are particular and have achieved with a special delicacy. In order to show the efficiencies of the method, some examples have presented that had achieved the more desirable and accurate ranking. The calculated results of performing this method have compared with the Anderson-Peterson method and its flexibility has studied according to the analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Suggested Citation

  • Behzad Paryzad & Esmaeil Najafi & Hamed Kazemipoor & Nasser Shahsavari Pour, 2018. "The new ranking method of the decision making units in DEA: with an approach to modifying the cross efficiency method," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(3), pages 387-400.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:30:y:2018:i:3:p:387-400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=95533
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:30:y:2018:i:3:p:387-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=188 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.