IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisen/v28y2018i4p421-432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance comparisons of utilisation of silo and non-silo systems in mechanising fertiliser application in Malaysian oil palm plantation industry

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Esyam Bin Adip
  • Darius El Pebrian

Abstract

The labour shortage and rising of fertiliser prices that is being faced by the oil palm plantation industries in Malaysia becomes challenging problems in their operations to achieve sustainability of economic and productivity. Thus, mechanisation has been adopted as an alternative approach to replace labour and at the same time to save costs in fertiliser application. This study was conducted to compare field performances of silo and non-silo systems in mechanising fertiliser application in Malaysian oil palm plantation industry. The silo system uses a temporary silo for storage the fertiliser in the field, while the non-silo system applies directly the fertiliser from the storage house. The results showed that the silo system gave a field capacity of 3.77 ha h−1 or 1.5 times greater than that of 2.49 ha h−1 of the non-silo. The total cost of silo was USD 3.31 ha−1 or 5.74% higher as compared to USD 3.12 ha−1 of the non-silo. The findings are only applicable for flat and undulating areas. Nonetheless, both systems can be considered as low-cost systems as compared to the manual system, which requires a total costs ranging from USD 3.66 ha−1 to USD 4.28 ha−1 for fertilising operation. The silo system is recommended for those plantations which need a timeliness of fertiliser application in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Esyam Bin Adip & Darius El Pebrian, 2018. "Performance comparisons of utilisation of silo and non-silo systems in mechanising fertiliser application in Malaysian oil palm plantation industry," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(4), pages 421-432.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:28:y:2018:i:4:p:421-432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=90443
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:28:y:2018:i:4:p:421-432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=188 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.