IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisen/v10y2012i3p355-375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maintenance policy selection: a review towards building proper selection model

Author

Listed:
  • Ding Siew Hong
  • Shahrul Kamaruddin
  • Ishak Abdul Azid

Abstract

In the past few decades, various maintenance policies with different operation principles, such as preventive or predictive maintenance were developed due to importance of maintenance in current industries. However, the implementation of a maintenance policy must suit the specific conditions and constraints of a specific company. Thus it is important to identify and then select the optimal maintenance policy for a system in order to gain maximum effectiveness. This paper reviews current research on selecting the optimal maintenance policy in various industries and recommendations for future research regarding new methods of selecting an optimal maintenance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ding Siew Hong & Shahrul Kamaruddin & Ishak Abdul Azid, 2012. "Maintenance policy selection: a review towards building proper selection model," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 355-375.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:10:y:2012:i:3:p:355-375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45680
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ishizaka, Alessio & Nemery, Philippe, 2014. "Assigning machines to incomparable maintenance strategies with ELECTRE-SORT," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 45-59.
    2. Caiyun Niu & Jiang Jiang & Bingfeng Ge & Yingwu Chen, 2022. "Preventive maintenance model based on the renewal-geometric process," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(2), pages 348-356, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:10:y:2012:i:3:p:355-375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=188 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.