IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisde/v8y2014i4p394-408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How arguments are justified in the media debate on climate change in the USA and France

Author

Listed:
  • Tuomas Ylä-Anttila
  • Anna Kukkonen

Abstract

This paper examines the differences in the values that are evoked to justify arguments in the media debate on climate change in USA and France from 1997 to 2011. We find that climate change is more often discussed in terms of justice, democracy, and legal regulation in France, while monetary value plays a more important role as a justification for climate policy arguments in the USA. Technological and scientific arguments are more often made in France, and ecological arguments equally in both countries. We argue that understanding these national differences in argumentation at least partly as reflections of deep-seated cultural conceptions about what is worthy may help in understanding why disagreement persists in the global politics of climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuomas Ylä-Anttila & Anna Kukkonen, 2014. "How arguments are justified in the media debate on climate change in the USA and France," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 394-408.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisde:v:8:y:2014:i:4:p:394-408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=66658
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Héloïse Valette, 2024. "Analysing the Evolution of Water Governance Models in Indonesia Through the Economies of Worth Framework," Post-Print hal-04412387, HAL.
    2. Salonen, Hilma, 2018. "Public Justification Analysis of Russian Renewable Energy Strategies," SocArXiv ft26v, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisde:v:8:y:2014:i:4:p:394-408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=33 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.