IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijiscm/v9y2017i2p125-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unmixed signals: stock market reaction to subsequent announcements of strategic alliances

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Zhao
  • Tie-Nan Wang

Abstract

In contrast to initial announcements, subsequent announcements of strategic alliances are more effective signals transferring more specific and credible progress information to investors. However, no comprehensive analysis of information updates on alliance progress activities exists. We address this limitation by distinguishing the signalling effects between initial and subsequent disclosures of strategic alliances. Using event study, the signalling effect is measured by cumulative abnormal returns with alliance data from China during 2001 and 2016. We find that investors react positively and significantly to both initial and subsequent disclosures, but in different reaction patterns. Specifically, due to information leakage effects, the stock market reacts negatively to subsequent reports from day -5 to -3 and then, reacts positively both in an immediate term (on day 0) and over the subsequent event window with fluctuations. Additionally, the stock market significantly rewards alliance performance announcements, but responds negatively to progress and termination reports. This study contributes to the strategic alliance literature and helps managers in making information disclosure strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Zhao & Tie-Nan Wang, 2017. "Unmixed signals: stock market reaction to subsequent announcements of strategic alliances," International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 125-148.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijiscm:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:125-148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=87973
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijiscm:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:125-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=79 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.